The I found this. I guess I'm not the only one comparing the two in my mind.
Global Warming Fraud Uses Same Scientific Method as Evolution | Athanatos Christian Apologetics Ministry
The I found this. I guess I'm not the only one comparing the two in my mind.
Global Warming Fraud Uses Same Scientific Method as Evolution | Athanatos Christian Apologetics Ministry
[img]http://www.lutte-wrestling.com/old-train2.jpg[/img]
Global Warming isn't fabricated, I know you're talking about the emails, which they didn't come close to saying Global Warming was made up or anything. Neither is Evolution, you're talking a massive conspiracy for both, massive, and when I say massive...I mean impossible. It's like saying 911 was a conspiracy, while somethings aren't clear, a conspiracy even on that level is not possible.
So? It sounds like you didn't read the link but made a negative comment anyway?
[img]http://www.lutte-wrestling.com/old-train2.jpg[/img]
I did read the article, the first part it talks about both being a cover-up and conspiracy(if i read it right), then uses it as an excuse about ID being science? That's what I got from it, which is ridiculous.
The comment wasn't exactly about the whole article, just about it being some cover-up/conspiracy, which is impossible...esp. with evolution, too old, too in depth and too widely accepted for there not to be a leak the past 150 years. I'm not too into the global warming, though I believe it does exist, it's used too much as a marketing strategy and is written off a lot for that very reason - i say that, because the arguments against it are very weak.
The primary point made by the writer of the link is to point out the nearly identical slimball methods used by the proponents of both evolution and global warming to silence their critics, and they are absolutely spot on.
[img]http://www.lutte-wrestling.com/old-train2.jpg[/img]
Yeah, and that blog has no agenda to change facts or slice and cut what they want to talk about. its a ministry gotch, do you really think they are trying to be objective?
spot on? by using words and sentences, but zero facts? just speculation without basis??
Bookmarks